Home Page | Link to the Techniques
Let us now take a look at Stanislavski's techniques.
Relaxation | |
When he observed the great actors and actresses of his day, Stanislavski noticed how fluid and lifelike their movements were. They seemed to be in a state of complete freedom and relaxation, letting the behavior of the character come through effortlessly. He concluded that unwanted tension has to be eliminated and that the performer at all times attain a state of physical and vocal relaxation. |
|
Concentration and Observation | |
Stanislavski also discovered that gifted performers always appear fully concentrated on some object, person, or event while onstage. Stanislavski referred to the extent or range of concentration as a circle of attention. This circle of attention can be compared to a circle of light on a darkened stage. the performer should begin with the idea that it is a small, tight, circle including only himself or herself and perhaps one other person or one piece of furniture. When the performer has established a strong circle of attention, he or she can enlarge the circle outward to include the entire stage area. In this way performers will stop worrying about the audience and lose their self-consciousness. |
|
Importance of Specifics | |
One of Stanislavski's techniques was an emphasis on concrete details. A performer
should never try to act in general, he said, and should never try to convey
a feeling such as fear or love in some vague, amorphous way. In life, Stanislavski
said, we express emotions in terms of specifics: an anxious woman twists a
handkerchief, an angry boy throws a rock at a trash can, a nervous businessman
jangles his keys. Performers must find similar activities. The performer must also conceive of the situation in which a character exists (which Stanislavski referred to as the given circumstances ) in term of specifics. In what kind of space does an event take place: formal, informal, public, domestic? How does it feel? What is the temperature? The lighting? What has gone on just before? What is expected in the moments ahead? Again, those questions must be answered in concrete terms. |
|
Inner Truth | |
An innovative aspect of Stanislavski's work has to do with
inner truth,
which deals with the internal or subjective world of characters - that is,
their thoughts and emotions. The early phases of Stanislavski's research
took place while he was also directing the major dramas of Anton Chekhov.
Plays like The Seagull and The Cherry Orchard have less to
do with external action or what the characters say than what the characters
are feeling and thinking but often do not verbalize. It becomes apparent that
Stanislavski's approach would be very beneficial in realizing the inner life
of such characters. Stanislavski had several ideas about how to achieve a sense of inner truth. one being the magic if. If is a word which can transform our thoughts; through it we can imagine ourselves in virtually any situation. "If I suddenly became wealthy..." "If I were vacationing on the Caribbean Island..." "If I had great talent..." "If that person who insulted me comes near me again..." The word if becomes a powerful lever for the mind; it can lift us out of ourselves a give us a sense of absolute certainty about imaginary circumstances. |
|
Action Onstage | |
What? Why? How? An important principle of Stanislavski's system is that all action onstage must have a purpose. This means that the performer's attention must always be focused on a series of physical actions linked together by the circumstances of the play. Stanislavski determined these actions by asking three essential questions: What? Why? How? An action is performed, such as opening a letter (the what). The letter is opened because someone has said that it contains extremely damaging information about the character (the why). The letter is opened anxiously, fearfully (the how), because of the calamitous effect it might have on the character. These physical actions, which occur from moment to moment in a performance, are in turn governed by the character's overall objective in the play. | |
Through Line of a Role | |
According to Sstanislavski, in order to develop continuity in a part,
the actor or actress should find the superobjective of a character.
What is it, above all else, that the character wants during the course of
a play? What is the character's driving force? If a goal can be established
toward which the character strives, it will give the performer an overall
objective. From this objective can be developed a through line which
can be grasped, as a skier on a ski lift grabs a towline and is carried to
the top. Another term for through line is spine. To help develop the through line, Stanislavski urged performers to divide scenes into unit (sometimes called beats). In each unit there is an objective, and the intermediate objectives running through a play lead ultimately to the overall objective. |
|
Ensemble Playing | |
Except in one-person shows, performers do not act alone; they interact with other people. Stanislavski was aware that many performers tend to "stop acting," or lose their concentration, when they are not the main characters in a scene or when someone else is talking. Such performers make a great effort when they are speaking but not when they are listening. This tendency destroys the through line and causes the performer to move into and out of a role. That, in turn, weakens the sense of the ensemble - the playing together of all the performers. |
|
Stanislavski and Psychophysical Action | |
A character's actions will lead to his / her emotions. (This is a tough one.) Stanislavski began to develop his techniques
in the early part of the twentieth century, and at first he emphasized the
inner aspects of training: for example, various ways of getting in touch with
the performer's unconscious. Beginning around 1917, however, he began to look
more and more at purposeful action, or what he called pyshophysical action.
(An action which has a purpose, and leads to feelings about the action taken.)
A student at one of his lectures that year took a note and noticed the change:
"Whereas action previously had been taught as the expression of a previously- |